Macro

Warsh Called Growth Strong and Inflation "Too High," Then Chose to Wait. Five-Year Yields Fell and 30-Year Yields Rose

The Fed held at 3.75% to 4.00% in a 10-2 vote, with Lisa Cook and Beth Hammack wanting a hike. Warsh made no December commitment. Five-year yields fell after the decision, 30-year yields rose and the dollar gave back its gain. The Fed will …

Warsh Called Growth Strong and Inflation "Too High," Then Chose to Wait. Five-Year Yields Fell and 30-Year Yields Rose
Warsh Called Growth Strong and Inflation "Too High," Then Chose to Wait. Five-Year Yields Fell and 30-Year Yields Rose

The Fed held at 3.75% to 4.00% in a 10-2 vote, with Lisa Cook and Beth Hammack wanting a hike. Warsh made no December commitment. Five-year yields fell after the decision, 30-year yields rose and the dollar gave back its gain. The Fed will also set rates at fewer meetings from 2027.

Federal Reserve Chair Kevin Warsh spent Wednesday afternoon describing an economy that hardly needs help and inflation that is still too high. His committee left rates where they were anyway. The bond market's reaction suggested it sees a patient Fed in the near term and more risk further out.

The Federal Open Market Committee held its target range for the federal funds rate at 3.75% to 4.00%. The vote was 10-2. Lisa D. Cook and Beth M. Hammack dissented in favor of a quarter-point increase. It was Cook's first dissent on a policy decision. In September, when the committee last raised rates, the vote was 12-0.

The economy the Chair described

Warsh's opening statement read like a case for tightening. First-half growth was revised up to 2.4% from 1.8%, he said, and "the third quarter appears to have brought an even more rapid advance," with consumer spending "likely running above 3 percent growth" and business investment "likely rising at about a double-digit pace." On jobs, "conditions are quite positive."

On prices, he was blunter. Inflation "has been running above the Committee's objective for close to 6 years. It's our responsibility to get inflation down." He noted that "energy and related prices have moved higher again in recent weeks," and that the committee's discussion "focused mainly on the price stability side of our remit."

He also declined to call policy restrictive. Financial and credit conditions have tightened for some businesses and households since September's hike, he said, but "while overall financial conditions are tighter, I'm unwilling and unable to call them tight."

Why the majority waited anyway

The statement itself made the change. September's line, "Today's policy action will support a timelier return to the Committee's 2 percent goal," was replaced with "The accumulation of more information will help the Committee determine the policy stance appropriate to ensure a timely return of inflation to the Committee's 2 percent goal." Growth was upgraded from a "solid" to a "strong" pace.

In his remarks, Warsh framed the decision as taking stock. "We've made clear our readiness to act as circumstances require, and we have shown our willingness to act," he said. "The information we receive over the coming period will help us determine where we want policy to be." Answering questions, he said the committee's broad judgment was that its tightening was starting to have some effect but that it had reached no firm conclusions, and that politics played no role in the decision.

He made no commitment on December either way.

What the curve did

Treasuries moved in opposite directions after the decision. The 5-year yield was about 4.83% at 2:45 p.m. Eastern, roughly 4 basis points below its level before the statement, and the 13-week bill yield fell about 6 basis points on the day. The 10-year yield, about 5.02% before the statement, was about 5.04% just before 3 p.m., and the 30-year rose to about 5.36% from about 5.32%.

That pattern is a steeper curve: lower yields where the next few Fed decisions matter most, higher yields where inflation and the government's borrowing needs matter most. It fits a market reading the Fed as patient on near-term hikes while still worried about inflation over the long run. Oil stayed up almost 3% on the day and new headlines on Iran crossed during the press conference, so the long-end rise cannot be pinned on Warsh alone.

The dollar gave back its gain. The dollar index, up about 0.2% before the statement, was roughly flat at 101.94 by about 3:30 p.m., and the euro rose about 0.3%. The S&P 500 dipped after the statement, rallied while Warsh spoke and gave much of it back, standing about 0.2% higher at 7,735 at 3:30 p.m., while the equal-weighted version of the index was down about 0.2%. Rate-sensitive stocks lost more ground: a homebuilder ETF fell about 2% and a bank ETF about 1%. The 30-year mortgage rate in the Mortgage Bankers Association's weekly survey was 7.37%.

Pricing for a December hike stayed high. An average of Kalshi and Polymarket compiled by DeFi Rate put it at about 83% shortly after 3 p.m. Kalshi alone had it at about 79% early Wednesday, so the two figures are not a like-for-like comparison. On Kalshi, the contract on a hike at this meeting last traded at 3 cents, a minute before it closed at 1:59 p.m.

Fewer decision days ahead

Warsh also announced a change to how the Fed sets policy. The committee will keep eight meetings a year, but in 2027 one will focus only on strategy, "with neither a vote on the federal funds rate nor a policy statement anticipated." In 2028, he expects two strategy meetings and six for setting policy. He called it "an institutional choice." Which 2027 meeting becomes strategy-only has not been specified.

Fewer rate-setting dates mean longer gaps between chances to move, which could give each meeting, and the data released between them, more weight in markets.

The debate December inherits

The hawkish reading starts with Warsh's own words. Inflation is "too high," energy prices are rising again, conditions are not "tight," consumer spending may have grown above 3% last quarter and two officials already wanted to hike. On that view December is the default, and the higher long-end yields and high December pricing reflect it.

The patient reading points to what the committee actually did. It held despite all of that, replaced its tightening rationale with a promise to gather information, and offered no forward guidance. Front-end yields fell and the dollar weakened, which suggests traders saw less urgency for the next move than the Chair's description of the economy implied.

Both readings meet on Thursday morning, when third-quarter GDP and September PCE inflation will test the picture Warsh painted.

What to watch

Thursday's GDP and PCE releases, the final transcript of the press conference, any statements from Cook and Hammack explaining their dissents, closing Treasury yields and the slope of the curve, the Treasury's quarterly refunding on Nov. 4, the Fed's announcement of which 2027 meeting will be strategy-only, and the next meeting on Dec. 8 and 9, which brings new economic projections.

More articles from FinancialMarkets.com