Private Markets

Ramp's $60 Billion Price Is Up to 30 Times the Revenue It Reports. Modal Got Under 16 Times a Day Earlier

Two late-stage rounds announced on consecutive days show investors paying very different multiples for growth. Ramp, which says it is cash-flow positive, raised $1.85 billion at a price about 36% above June's, while Modal's AI-cloud round m…

Ramp's $60 Billion Price Is Up to 30 Times the Revenue It Reports. Modal Got Under 16 Times a Day Earlier
Ramp's $60 Billion Price Is Up to 30 Times the Revenue It Reports. Modal Got Under 16 Times a Day Earlier

Two late-stage rounds announced on consecutive days show investors paying very different multiples for growth. Ramp, which says it is cash-flow positive, raised $1.85 billion at a price about 36% above June's, while Modal's AI-cloud round more than tripled its valuation on a usage-based run rate.

Private investors this week priced two fast-growing companies at multiples that differ by roughly a factor of two. The more expensive one is not the AI company.

Ramp, which sells corporate cards and spend-management software, said Thursday it raised $1.85 billion at a $60 billion valuation. Dragoneer Investment Group led, and Thrive Capital, Founders Fund, Sands Capital and Avenir Growth co-led. The company said it has passed $2 billion of annualized revenue and generates positive cash flow.

Because Ramp describes its revenue as more than $2 billion, that puts the valuation at no more than about 30 times its stated revenue figure. On Wednesday, Modal, which rents computing capacity to AI developers, raised money at a $15.75 billion post-money valuation against a run rate it described as more than $1 billion, a multiple of under 16 times.

Paying for durability

The difference reflects what each company is selling and how it has grown. Ramp's step-up was the smaller of the two: its June round valued it at $44 billion, so the new price is about 36% higher four months later. Modal's rose about 3.4-fold in five months.

Ramp's case rests on scale and consistency. It counts more than 85,000 customers and more than $275 billion of annualized purchase volume, up 175% from a year earlier, and says it is cash-flow positive. Spending that runs through a corporate card tends to recur month after month, which may explain why investors will pay more per dollar of revenue than for a usage-based AI infrastructure business whose demand can swing.

The comparison has limits. Both revenue figures are company statements rather than audited results, the two companies define them in their own ways, and Ramp did not say whether $60 billion is measured before or after the new money, or how much of the round went to existing holders selling shares.

What the multiple asks

At up to 30 times revenue, Ramp's price assumes that revenue keeps climbing toward the pace of purchase volume. If revenue grows with what customers put through the platform, volume growing 175% a year leaves room to grow into the valuation. If revenue grows more slowly than volume, the multiple will take longer to come down.

Corporate spending is also cyclical. A company valued on what its customers spend is exposed to an economy in which, this week, retail sales outside autos and gasoline barely grew and borrowing costs remain high.

Ramp has not announced plans for an initial public offering.

Market implications

One reading is that investors are making a sensible distinction. They are paying a premium for a cash-generating platform with broad customer adoption, and a smaller one for an AI infrastructure company whose economics public markets are questioning this week.

A second reading is that private multiples are drifting away from anything that can be verified. Both prices rest on company-reported figures, neither round's full terms are disclosed, and a valuation of up to 30 times revenue leaves little room for a slowdown in business spending.

What to watch

Whether Ramp publishes audited figures or moves toward a listing, any secondary or tender activity that tests the $60 billion price, and whether growth in purchase volume holds as businesses face higher borrowing costs.

More articles from FinancialMarkets.com