Private Markets

Gamma Communications Has One Firm Offer on the Table and a Rival Bidder That Just Lost Its Partner

Epiris has a board-recommended cash offer at 1,120p a share. Waterland has said there is no certainty it will make one at all, and its deadline is Friday. Epiris holds the only firm offer for Gamma Communications, a board-recommended cash o…

Gamma Communications Has One Firm Offer on the Table and a Rival Bidder That Just Lost Its Partner
Gamma Communications Has One Firm Offer on the Table and a Rival Bidder That Just Lost Its Partner

Epiris has a board-recommended cash offer at 1,120p a share. Waterland has said there is no certainty it will make one at all, and its deadline is Friday.

Epiris holds the only firm offer for Gamma Communications, a board-recommended cash offer at 1,120 pence per share valuing the company at roughly 1.03 billion to 1.08 billion pounds.

Waterland Private Equity, which had been preparing a competing bid, disclosed on September 11 that it is "no longer acting in concert with the Giacom Group" and that "there can be no certainty that any offer will be made."

No firm Waterland offer has been announced.

Losing the consortium partner is the material development

A private equity firm preparing a competing bid for a listed telecommunications services business alongside a strategic partner is in a materially different position from one preparing to bid alone.

A trade partner brings two things to a contested situation: industry-specific diligence capability that shortens the path to a credible offer, and, more importantly, synergies that support a higher price than a financial sponsor can justify on standalone cash flows. When the partner leaves, the bidder loses both. What remains is a financial sponsor attempting to outbid a board-recommended offer on standalone economics alone.

Waterland's own language reflects that. A statement that there can be no certainty of an offer is the standard formulation, but it is a step down from active bid preparation.

The deadline is Friday, with one caveat on sourcing

Under the U.K. takeover regime, a named possible bidder operates under a deadline by which it must either announce a firm intention to make an offer or step away, commonly described as a put-up-or-shut-up requirement. The Takeover Panel sets that deadline.

A September 18 deadline for Waterland is carried consistently across trade coverage of the situation. The September 11 regulatory announcement itself states only that the Panel will announce the deadline by which Waterland must clarify its position, so the specific date rests on secondary sourcing rather than on that document. Whatever the exact date, the clock is short and the window is measured in days.

What a board recommendation does and does not do

One point of mechanics is easy to get wrong. A target board recommending one bidder's offer does not, by itself, end a separate possible bidder's ability to compete. The recommendation is a directors' opinion delivered to shareholders, not a bar on competing offers, and a rival can still announce a firm intention up to its own deadline.

Waterland's position is weakened by the loss of its partner and by its own language, not by the existence of the Epiris recommendation.

What resolves it

Either a firm Waterland offer or a formal statement that it does not intend to make one, by Friday. Absent a competing bid, the Epiris offer proceeds toward shareholder approval at 1,120 pence.

## PREDICTION MARKETS

More articles from FinancialMarkets.com